Paris Peace Conference – 1919

admin February 20th, 2010

25 Responses to “Paris Peace Conference – 1919”

  1. 2VernalEquinox5on 20 Feb 2010 at 9:20 pm

    Brilliant Video

  2. biggerrerinton 20 Feb 2010 at 9:20 pm

    entente

  3. patakimateon 20 Feb 2010 at 9:20 pm

    FUCK antant

  4. hasounon 20 Feb 2010 at 9:20 pm

    The war was no ones fault but it was the mistake of the old way of doing things that the strongest rule the week and get to do what they want. because the European powers where dividing the world among them they became to strong to exist in peace and by allying themselves up they made fear and hostilities grow at the end their pride got the best of all of them. France wanted revenge for 1871. Russia wanted all Slavs to be respected, Serbia wanted all serbes to be under serbia’s flag.

  5. randypan71on 20 Feb 2010 at 9:20 pm

    They did occupy Serbia with Austria-Hungary and Bulgaria from 1915. Yeah you’re right, it was never part of their empire

  6. scarynight63on 20 Feb 2010 at 9:20 pm

    lol what happened in 1945?

  7. laurensadriaanseon 20 Feb 2010 at 9:20 pm

    the french got what they deserved in 1940

  8. coralsea725on 20 Feb 2010 at 9:20 pm

    Not only that, the terms of the peace treaties signed after the first world war were harsh, angering the Germans, which in turn helped lead to the second world war.

  9. norkantalkodamon 20 Feb 2010 at 9:20 pm

    Germany became some of the real rulers like the british empires too mighty. Wilhelm II was an stupid bastard and it was easy to bring him and the germans into war and easily switched off. The 2nd WW was a logical consequence of the Versailles treaty, which was set to make the germans bankrupt for the next 70 years. That could not fly, so it was engineered, that it get into war again. The british plan worked fine, as they had switched the germans off for about 100 years really.

  10. Subaangenon 20 Feb 2010 at 9:20 pm

    It was the weakpoints of “the league nation”, that resulted to second world war.

  11. istorija4everon 20 Feb 2010 at 9:20 pm

    Yes that is correct, I see that you know alot of Balkan history, from which country are you “Desert Fox ” :) )))

  12. EdwardRommelon 20 Feb 2010 at 9:20 pm

    My apologies to you…I dd in error write that Germans had ruled Serbia…

    you are correct Germans never ruled Serbia…but they did rule Bosnia-hercegovina for 10 years.

  13. EdwardRommelon 20 Feb 2010 at 9:20 pm

    You are aware of the illegal annexation of Bosnia Hercegovina by Austria-Hungary in 1908…so yes your Bosnia was ruled by German Austrians for 10 years…1908 to 1918.

  14. EdwardRommelon 20 Feb 2010 at 9:20 pm

    I was referring to the other Germanic empire…Austria-Hungary..

    Austria-Hungary was ruled primarily by German Austrians and Magyar Hungarians.

    Hence German Austrians did in fact rule Bosnia-Hercegovina….I never said they ruled Serbia though they tried to dismantle and destroy serbia.

  15. istorija4everon 20 Feb 2010 at 9:20 pm

    Germans had never ruled in Serbia and Bosnia!!

  16. GodoyGarciaon 20 Feb 2010 at 9:20 pm

    Trabalho de Negociação INterncaional – Apresentação IESB

  17. AZsaturnon 20 Feb 2010 at 9:20 pm

    But in Poznań were colonials.

  18. EdwardRommelon 20 Feb 2010 at 9:20 pm

    I think the Versailles treaty was very fair in most cases. The difficulty was in drawing a border between Poland and Germany because Bismark had a policy of moving Germans into Polish estates…so by 1919…the populations were intermingled. The VT basically gave areas that were atleast 50/50 polish to poland…like W. Prussia and Posen.

    Germans had ruled Slavs for hundreds of years in Bohemia, Moravia, Poland, Galicia, Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia, Serbia…

  19. AZsaturnon 20 Feb 2010 at 9:20 pm

    I forgive to You. The offence is me very much a difficult task. Few it equalled to this challenge.

  20. AZsaturnon 20 Feb 2010 at 9:20 pm

    It is the serious trace too Danish roots of the city. Polish substantive “Gdańsk” could be an effect of the confusion of the Danish substantive “Dansk” and the Kashubian substantive “Gduńsk”. Saint Adalbert of Prague used words “Gyddanyzc”. Into Old-Slavic speech letters “Gd” I marked marshy grounds. So, the etymology is insecure, but complicated. Showing that the multinational city. Which was a castletown of Pomeranian princes.

  21. AZsaturnon 20 Feb 2010 at 9:20 pm

    The curiosity. We always spoke that Gdańsk had a minimum of 1012 years. Because the earliest written mention originates from the year 997. And You made look younger the city by half. Perhaps Gdańsk was built by Danes? His name reminds “Dansk”, the substantive denominative Danish language in Danish language. The interesting chance? The all centre of Gdańsk is de facto a retort. Original buildings are only in the district Oliwa and a few in Wrzeszcz. There Red Army did not relax .

  22. AZsaturnon 20 Feb 2010 at 9:20 pm

    Hahahaha. You right. The central authority let go to the hell. No countries. Only states-cities. Forgive, but this is not fine. Every city is a part of the definite homeland. I do not agree this fad of the Entente. The inhabitant of the definite city is only vassal. I never was in Lublin. But perhaps I would have the right to grow angry, if it announced the secession? Vassals. The small fragments. The state.

  23. AZsaturnon 20 Feb 2010 at 9:20 pm

    The most of houses in these cities surely built Germans. Some, very sporadically built Czeches, Kashubians, Old Prusians, Lithuanians and Poles. In Gdańsk lived even Portugueses. Because was on the very important trade route. But who was a true ruler of Gdańsk? The mayor? The town council? King? Who was a king of the Gdańsk ground? How long? The Kingdom of Prussia barefacedly took to himself Gdańsk. Quite not long ago. From your words it results that Paris is of German.

  24. AZsaturnon 20 Feb 2010 at 9:20 pm

    I also sometimes think that England is still a Roman province. I joked. Because lawyers invented the substantive “Desuetude”. When you ask after the logic, my heart speaks that grounds of U.S.A. are owing to Indians.

  25. rzecze1on 20 Feb 2010 at 9:20 pm

    He, he :) Stop crying about it! Germans started 2 wars and lost both of them. In each losing more and more land. I think they had their lesson. But if I’m mistaken and they will try to mess sth up again, we’ll be erasing inscriptions on houses, monuments, fassades etc. in Berlin… sorry… in West Posen! :)
    P.S. You cannot change history, but you can change future!

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply