Holy Jebus your right. I am going to sleep soundly tonight and lots of religious people will die tonight. Good night space daddy and let me sleep without hunger. Thanks!!!!
scientists know the (approx) age of the world based on radioactive carbon dating and other types of dating. To concede that scientists do NOT know the age of the world is again, shortsighted.
And incedentally, whether darwin was a pope or a freemasons does not matter because it does not diminish his scientific principle. We know that Hitler was a roman catholic but we do not equate Hitler with all roman catholics. Again, your argument is invalid.
They are: 1 No genetic drift 2 No migration 3 No mutation 4 No selection 5 No differential reproduction. These conditions are the absence of things that CAUSE evolution (what you are arguing). However, since it is been proven (In MANY cases) that one of or multiple conditions HAVE been met when calculating the allele frequencies, then evolution is the inevitable result.
If you ARE a 30 yr old man, then the fact that you cannot spell ruins all of your credibility. Also because you have rejected scientific proof, you are probably a “masters” in something like communications or religion or some other useless degree. So I will attempt to explain this to you.
There is a phenomenon called the hardy-weinberg equilibrium. It is 5 conditions that determine that evolution will NOT occur in a population if all 5 conditions are met.
nope, im a 30 year old man with a masters and a good job. comparisons 100 years ago? hahah im just tell u truth. scientist dont know if the world is millions of years old theres no way they can and thats just common sense. like i said earlier, it all preconceived opinion. just like when people thought the earth was flat and they were wrong. darwins evolution agenda is just as pathetic as he was.
Not contradicting myself. I am telling you to pick up a book. You are clearly a younger boy that is not very smart. You are using juvenile comparisons that were asked about 100 years ago. Evolution is not about a carbon copy. It about change. It that hard to understand? You actually think that humans looked the same way for millions of years…..are you kidding me. 6000 yr old earth???wtf
hahah ur contradicting yourself. evident u know about evolution and tying to defend it? muhahaha do your research cause humans have 46 and monkeys have 48. judging by your comments, i can see this discussion is over
hahahaha, u couldnt even respond to my comment so it could reach my inbox. just by u doing that, i can already tell ur uncomfortable. unicellular can NEVER evolve in to multicellular. evolution says we are related to the modern great apes. the gorilla, chimps,etc. they may have hands like us but gues what, we have 46 chromosomes and they have 48. if something evolves from something else, they should be greatly similar
You are confused thinking that scientists are suggesting we evolved from MODERN chimps. That is a gross misconception.
And unicellular life CAN evolve into multicellular life.
Seriously, if you can wrap your mind around it, read some fucking genetics books
hahah wtf r u talking. you could work in at a zoo and inhale the chemicals that a weasel does causing the same internal chemical damage. does that mean ur related to weasels just cause u have the same chemical inside of u? no.
You have obviously never had a course in genetics. What you heard was that genetically speaking, we share 70% of our genetic structure with a banana. This is based on the cellular level of our ability to metabolize. This has been proven with the human genome. Scientists do not state that dogs and bananas or whatever all came from a common ancestor. They simply share 70% of the same adenine, cytosine, guanine, and thiamine base pairs.
i gave u arguments and youl fail to analyze them. plants cells are different that animal cells, evolutionist also say we came from a amoeba which by the way is unicellular in which we are multicultural, there are too many flaws in evolution
I was so happy when the pope died
this verse just means the earth has obvious beautiful features.
“The earth takes shape like clay under a seal;
its features stand out like those of a garment.”
NIV
no there is a verse that seems to say the earth is flat…havent read it have you?
hahah the bible never said the earth was flat. the ground is flat. not the earth
“just like when people thought the earth was flat and they were wrong. ”
So you actually believe in a round earth? The bible has a verse that indicates a flat earth. The whole book flip flops
I saw jebus in the burning weeds! I am saved!
Holy Jebus your right. I am going to sleep soundly tonight and lots of religious people will die tonight. Good night space daddy and let me sleep without hunger. Thanks!!!!
scientists know the (approx) age of the world based on radioactive carbon dating and other types of dating. To concede that scientists do NOT know the age of the world is again, shortsighted.
And incedentally, whether darwin was a pope or a freemasons does not matter because it does not diminish his scientific principle. We know that Hitler was a roman catholic but we do not equate Hitler with all roman catholics. Again, your argument is invalid.
They are: 1 No genetic drift 2 No migration 3 No mutation 4 No selection 5 No differential reproduction. These conditions are the absence of things that CAUSE evolution (what you are arguing). However, since it is been proven (In MANY cases) that one of or multiple conditions HAVE been met when calculating the allele frequencies, then evolution is the inevitable result.
If you ARE a 30 yr old man, then the fact that you cannot spell ruins all of your credibility. Also because you have rejected scientific proof, you are probably a “masters” in something like communications or religion or some other useless degree. So I will attempt to explain this to you.
There is a phenomenon called the hardy-weinberg equilibrium. It is 5 conditions that determine that evolution will NOT occur in a population if all 5 conditions are met.
nope, im a 30 year old man with a masters and a good job. comparisons 100 years ago? hahah im just tell u truth. scientist dont know if the world is millions of years old theres no way they can and thats just common sense. like i said earlier, it all preconceived opinion. just like when people thought the earth was flat and they were wrong. darwins evolution agenda is just as pathetic as he was.
yes realdeal…you are the next scholar for the religious people….you have written many books and have studied for years….job well done
Not contradicting myself. I am telling you to pick up a book. You are clearly a younger boy that is not very smart. You are using juvenile comparisons that were asked about 100 years ago. Evolution is not about a carbon copy. It about change. It that hard to understand? You actually think that humans looked the same way for millions of years…..are you kidding me. 6000 yr old earth???wtf
hahah ur contradicting yourself. evident u know about evolution and tying to defend it? muhahaha do your research cause humans have 46 and monkeys have 48. judging by your comments, i can see this discussion is over
“we have 46 chromosomes and they have 48. ”
lol…wow so you’re the next scholar….do your research.
hahahaha, u couldnt even respond to my comment so it could reach my inbox. just by u doing that, i can already tell ur uncomfortable. unicellular can NEVER evolve in to multicellular. evolution says we are related to the modern great apes. the gorilla, chimps,etc. they may have hands like us but gues what, we have 46 chromosomes and they have 48. if something evolves from something else, they should be greatly similar
You are confused thinking that scientists are suggesting we evolved from MODERN chimps. That is a gross misconception.
And unicellular life CAN evolve into multicellular life.
Seriously, if you can wrap your mind around it, read some fucking genetics books
hahah wtf r u talking. you could work in at a zoo and inhale the chemicals that a weasel does causing the same internal chemical damage. does that mean ur related to weasels just cause u have the same chemical inside of u? no.
You have obviously never had a course in genetics. What you heard was that genetically speaking, we share 70% of our genetic structure with a banana. This is based on the cellular level of our ability to metabolize. This has been proven with the human genome. Scientists do not state that dogs and bananas or whatever all came from a common ancestor. They simply share 70% of the same adenine, cytosine, guanine, and thiamine base pairs.
hahah…fool we are 98% water….my beliefs outweigh yours….hahahaha
Dont you know you are made up of the same chemicals found in nature….
i mean we are multicellular
i gave u arguments and youl fail to analyze them. plants cells are different that animal cells, evolutionist also say we came from a amoeba which by the way is unicellular in which we are multicultural, there are too many flaws in evolution
imagine a grown man thinking we came from an explosion from a ball and that were related to rocks. muhahahahahah
“face evolution is false theory and i debunked it just by that one chimp”
yes…we just dropped from the sky…imagine a grown man that believes in that crap….