We need to arm everyone who can hold weapons and march on the next Bilderberg Group meeting. When those people are gone, humanity might have a chance. Google: “Leaked Agenda of the Bilderberg Group Meeting ’09″.
I remember when corporations and scientists were saying that genetically modified food would be cheaper and stop world hunger but food has gone up in price and more people are starving than ever before!
I can send invites too if he is not on and doesn’t send quick enough send me a pm i will be on untill 12 tonight and will be refreshing every 1-5 minutes FAST INVITE! LOCKERZ INVITES COMMON!
yes we need to worry about all that stuff he concluded to but that we’ll just slow it down. There is no stopping our world from becoming unlivable we need to prepare. We need to find a way to live in that unlivable world instead of trying to stop it.
Science is not proved by peer review. You can peer review data and models and correlate historical data until the end of time it proves nothing. A scientific theory is proved by accurately predicting the outcome of experiments. I would accept that it is not possible to conduct experiments on the earth so I would accept the global warming theory if the scientists involved were able to make semi accurate forecasts of future climate but they cannot.
It should not be called “Global Warming”. We should use the term “Climate Change”. Climate change IS happening. No it is not man-made, but nonetheless is still happening and we need to learn to adapt to it, not fight it. Our environment controls us, not vice versa.
The graphs they use are not lies. They are just shown on a tiny scale (relative to geological time scale) that the numbers look like they are sky-rocketing. When they show that same graph on a larger time scale, we see that it is not human made.Climate change has been happening continuously since the earth was made. It is nothing new. And humans DO have an impact, but we are not THE reason why carbon and temperature is increasing.
You’re clearly challenged in some way.
The only thing that was damamged in these emails were the projections on the study of dendrochronology.
So yeah, everything else which has been peer reviewed and tested and re-tested over the last 50 years still hold true.
Try again.
Er… the allow me to quote something for you.
“nothing in the stolen emails and other documents that found their way onto the Internet last week in any way challenges the science behind anthropogenic global warming. But a lot of the material does deal with one particular subfield of climatology, dendrochronology”
And if you look at it this is true. The only thing that was challenged by the emails was dendrochronology, which is the study of tree rings.
Oh, wow. I just got informed that you ARE in Japan. I’m sorry about that. ^_^ Nice to meet you! xoxo
Save the planet – kill yourself now.
We need to arm everyone who can hold weapons and march on the next Bilderberg Group meeting. When those people are gone, humanity might have a chance. Google: “Leaked Agenda of the Bilderberg Group Meeting ’09″.
What a pompous, supercilious little git !
We know how you pay your rent,
corporate mail-room clerk boy.
Were there only a god to start over.
I remember when corporations and scientists were saying that genetically modified food would be cheaper and stop world hunger but food has gone up in price and more people are starving than ever before!
Global warming…lol just a big ass BRAND!
FUCK GLOBAL WARMING
LETS TALK ABOUT DISTRIBUTION AND SUSTAINABILITY
oh AND CRIME (unethical preventable harm)
Genetically modified food is killing our bees!
I can send invites too if he is not on and doesn’t send quick enough send me a pm i will be on untill 12 tonight and will be refreshing every 1-5 minutes FAST INVITE! LOCKERZ INVITES COMMON!
stop talking shit man!!!
You take too long to get to get the point.
Truth is I got bored after 1:19!!!
It goes without saying idiots exist with environmental concerns
However, some government scientists are doing sceince on it. There is some cause for some concern
How much? I don’t know. Then again, I’m not an environmentalist.
Yes they can. Not completely of course, but climate models developped decades ago predicted accurately enough today’s weather.
Well done. Excellent! Excellent questions.
I commend this effort and will post this at my youtube video.
You apparently stopped reading after “peer reviewed”.
yes we need to worry about all that stuff he concluded to but that we’ll just slow it down. There is no stopping our world from becoming unlivable we need to prepare. We need to find a way to live in that unlivable world instead of trying to stop it.
Science is not proved by peer review. You can peer review data and models and correlate historical data until the end of time it proves nothing. A scientific theory is proved by accurately predicting the outcome of experiments. I would accept that it is not possible to conduct experiments on the earth so I would accept the global warming theory if the scientists involved were able to make semi accurate forecasts of future climate but they cannot.
It should not be called “Global Warming”. We should use the term “Climate Change”. Climate change IS happening. No it is not man-made, but nonetheless is still happening and we need to learn to adapt to it, not fight it. Our environment controls us, not vice versa.
The graphs they use are not lies. They are just shown on a tiny scale (relative to geological time scale) that the numbers look like they are sky-rocketing. When they show that same graph on a larger time scale, we see that it is not human made.Climate change has been happening continuously since the earth was made. It is nothing new. And humans DO have an impact, but we are not THE reason why carbon and temperature is increasing.
Would you mind providing a source for that number?
I’ve tried to find stuff like that in the past but to no avail.
If we allow ourselves to be taxed on the very thing we exhale, then it’s time for God to start over.
You’re clearly challenged in some way.
The only thing that was damamged in these emails were the projections on the study of dendrochronology.
So yeah, everything else which has been peer reviewed and tested and re-tested over the last 50 years still hold true.
Try again.
Er… the allow me to quote something for you.
“nothing in the stolen emails and other documents that found their way onto the Internet last week in any way challenges the science behind anthropogenic global warming. But a lot of the material does deal with one particular subfield of climatology, dendrochronology”
And if you look at it this is true. The only thing that was challenged by the emails was dendrochronology, which is the study of tree rings.
i got a message for you. YOUR MOM
great video! thanks!